From Leader Of Non Aligned Movement To Lapdog Of The West

From the Leader of the Non-Aligned Movement to the lapdog of the West – this is the story of India’s descent into Slavery – post-Independence.

Whoever controls Trincomalee controls the entire Indian oceans
– Bonaparte Napoleon

But where is India in this Napoleonic Calculus?
– Descartes

They seem to be evolving from British Corporate Press-titutes to America’s Asian Pivot Prostitutes.
– Jim De Witt

The foreign policy of any country should be derived from considerations of domestic security. In this sense, war is another form of diplomacy. This is perhaps the only lesson that we now ought to re-learn from our Western Cousins – the Partitioned Indians – aka the Pakistanis. This was the essential philosophy that we used for the rule of self-sufficiency and creation of a socialist-welfare state to re-distribute wealth among everyone in India post-Independence.

Though Jawaharlal Nehru was blamed initially for being too compliant with the British guided interests, his later actions at the United Nations has decisively proved the determined and dedicated statesmanship of Nehru in defining a self-sufficiency based foreign policy which resulted in some of the greatest Scientific, Military, Technological and Intelligence achievements in the past forty years until the advent of P.V. Narasimha Rao to the Prime Minister-ship of India.

Origins of Non-Aligned Movement

---

The World over had recognized India as having a unique foreign policy based on the novel Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) which is highly antagonistic and critical about the divisive, oppressive, exploitative rule and habits of the West and extremely critical about the reaction of the Russians to this Western oppression by taking the path of communism.

Running dog of Imperialism

While we were in the rudimentary stages of evolving this foreign policy, we had to face a war with China and our defeat in this war was blamed on Jawaharlal Nehru. Mao Zedong had called Nehru the “Running dog of Imperialism”, while in fact Nehru was determinedly steadfastly, doggedly, anti-Imperial, anti-Capitalist and anti-West; perhaps the Indians would do well to study the history of Mao, and debate the applicability of this epithet to him.

Assassinations of Indian leaders

Jawaharlal Nehru’s shift from being pro-British to anti-British resulted from the knowledge Nehru received about the manipulations of the British Intelligence using Indian right (as well as left) wing groups in the assassinations of the Indian leaders.

Jawaharlal Nehru’s shift from being pro-British to anti-British resulted from the knowledge Nehru received about the manipulations of the British Intelligence using Indian right (as well as left) wing groups in the assassinations of the Indian leaders, starting from the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi and Subhash Chandra Bose. Nehru was also outraged with the cynical attitude of the American Foreign Policy establishment under Allen Dulles who openly advocated Christian proselytization and aid as a hidden agenda of the American Foreign Policy especially in the Asian Countries.

During the United Nations proceedings on the Suez Crisis, India had taken a stand that was absolutely anti-Imperialist and anti-British, vociferously demanding that Britain be declared a terrorist state.

During the United Nations proceedings on the Suez Crisis, India had taken a stand that was absolutely anti-Imperialist and anti-British, vociferously demanding that Britain be declared a terrorist state – a position not lost on the Russian observers. But yet it is to Nehru’s credit that he never courted Russians, and did not allow India to drift into the Russian camp because he realized that the Communism and the use-misuse-abuse of Marx by the Russians is only a reaction by the Russians to the Western oppression, rather than being based on sound ideological foundation. Jawaharlal Nehru chose instead to set a course for India independent of two opposite warring Christian camps, masquerading under various names and terms, currently as Communism and Capitalism.

Jawaharlal Nehru – the architect of India’s independent foreign policy

---

In order for India to realize the goal, Nehru understood that the only route India can take was to become self-reliant. This open resistance towards imperial aggression in the form of Capitalism, post-Colonial rule was paid for with his life. The later Prime Ministers who understood his vision and continued his policies, have all paid for with their lives.

The course which Jawaharlal Nehru envisioned for India was set to revive the ancient glory and position of India as a beacon of knowledge and understanding, where a peaceful coexistence of multitudinous flowers of the human intellect were made possible. In order for India to realize the goal, Nehru understood that the only route India can take was to become self-reliant. This guiding visionary principles of foreign policy has set a course shaping the domestic, economic reality of the country.

Nehru realized that unless India becomes self-sufficient in terms of every aspect as Nation starting from food to security, we will not be able to realize our goal. His policy of creating temples of Modern India was a primary step in that direction. This open resistance towards imperial aggression in the form of Capitalism, post-Colonial rule was paid for with his life. The later Prime Ministers who understood his vision and continued his policies, have all paid for with their lives.

Assassination of Jawaharlal Nehru

The official version of Jawaharlal Nehru’s death is Cerebral Thrombosis, but the fact is that he was assassinated because the British calculated that since Nehru realized that the Chinese were played by the British, he would go on to break the United Nations.

The official version of Jawaharlal Nehru’s death is Cerebral Thrombosis, but the fact is that he was assassinated because the British calculated that since Nehru realized that the Chinese were played by the British, he would go on to break the United Nations (which at the time was only just in its formative stages) and push the Non-Aligned Movement as the leading world body and keep all the oppressors in check. In addition to this, the Nehruvian drive to make India self-sufficient was moving it away from the Commonwealth. If India could achieve this complete economic freedom and stand on her own efforts instead of having to rely on FDI and foreign help, this would serve as a role-model for all the other nations that had just got free from colonial rule.

Nehruvian Economics & British Response

With absolutely no qualified human resources (medical, scientific, technical) left after the Independence with Government of India’s exchequer being emptied out to the last pie by the British before they departed, and with Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination tearing apart the socio-cultural fabric of India and with British-instigated mercenaries disguising as Afghans occupying a third of Kashmir effectively cutting India’s land route to Afghanistan and to Central Asia, depriving it of the needed economic markets for development, the Nehruvian team against all odds decided to make India into a World Power.

Taking a page from the ancient art of statecraft, Nehruvian economics laid the foundation and re-defined socialism in the Indian context. The economy was divided into two sectors: core-sector and primary-secondary-ancillary sectors. The core sector being the responsibility of the government included defense, domestic infrastructure, education, agriculture. Later Banking and critically oil-industry was added to this area by Indira Gandhi when the supposedly patriotic oil industries refused to supply oil to the Indian army during the 1971 war. The massive frauds perpetrated in the private banking and insurance sectors made Nationalization of these two sectors and adding them to the core sectors absolutely necessary.

With absolutely no qualified human resources (medical, scientific, technical) left after the Independence with Government of India’s exchequer being emptied out to the last pie by the British before they departed, and with Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination tearing apart the socio-cultural fabric of India and with British-instigated mercenaries disguising as Afghans occupying a third of Kashmir effectively cutting India’s land route to Afghanistan and to Central Asia, depriving it of the needed economic markets for development, the Nehruvian team against all odds decided to make India into a World Power.

With the nationalization of the insurance sector under Feroze Gandhi every single rupee which was surplus after the insurance-running costs were over, went towards the building of the Nation. For which reason Feroze Gandhi had to be killed!

The men who worked under Nehru’s administrations and then under successive Prime Minsters took this job of making India into a World Power seriously into their heart, toiled day and night planning and executing it, generated resources in the most innovative way and utilized them with the maximum efficiency. With the nationalization of the insurance sector under Feroze Gandhi every single rupee which was surplus after the insurance-running costs were over, went towards the building of the Nation. For which reason Feroze Gandhi had to be killed!

Most of the insurance surplus and the banking surplus under the private managements were blown away by the avaricious consumption of the owners, or were utilized by manipulating the political process by creating Corpocracy.

Since the dawn of independence until 1985, India has poured thousands and thousands of crores into the core-sectors which became an engine for the other spheres of economy which was absolutely in the private Indian entrepreneurial hands. It is not that there were no inefficiencies during this process, but a series of checks and balances accountabilities and responsibilities were fixed. With this self-reliant, self-generating, self-sufficient economy at the core, India moved to assert its voice in International Affairs, by becoming the critical founding member of the Non Aligned Movement. (Note that the Janata government had censured the Russians for their move into Afghanistan.)

Non Aligned Movement vs United Nations

---

The Non-Aligned Movement was showing greater success than the United Nations in dealing with many international issues, and in-fact, the Non-Aligned Movement was even able to censure the major powers for the injustices perpetuated by them. Under the NAM (as well as under the UN charter) India has contributed its armed forces in various conflict zones around the world as peace-keepers, bringing at least a semblance of negotiated settlements of disputes.

Suez Crisis

To the absolute shock and surprise of the Russians, and towards an absolute detestation and hatred of the British and the Americans, India under Nehru had proposed three motions to censure Britain as a terrorist state and banish it from United Nations. India also threatened to pull out of the UN.

The first test of the United Nations as an international semi-legal body came when the Suez Crisis was brewing. The proceedings that took place in the United Nations showed clearly to the World in general but to Jawaharlal Nehru and V. K. Krishna Menon in particular, that the UN is merely a tool of the West and it has no interest in solving the problems of the newly formed nations. To the absolute shock and surprise of the Russians, and towards an absolute detestation and hatred of the British and the Americans, India under Nehru had proposed three motions to censure Britain as a terrorist state and banish it from United Nations. India also threatened to pull out of the UN.

The proposition that Nehru’s affair with Edwina Mountbatten (real or made up) would lead him to sacrifice the National interests is ridiculous and preposterous. More likely than not, this story has been circulated with this deliberate intention of defaming and belittling the achievements of India in general and Nehru in particular.

Assassination of Lal Bahadur Shastri

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was pushed upon him again on the question of Kashmir, by Western-instigated Pakistanis. Lal Bahadur Shastri resolved not only to fight but to solve the problem once and for all, by marching on the Rawalpindi (current Islamabad). But when he had pushed near Lahore, his death was decided upon before he left for Russia; the assassination plan being set in motion while he was in India itself by CIA-controlled Indian cronies, using time-released toxins, he (unexpectedly?) died – with the blame being put on the KGB itself.

Lal Bahadur Shastri continued these policies, basing on Military and Food Self-sufficiency as critical for the country to move forward, ignoring warnings from International bullies, and paid for his stand with his life.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 was pushed upon him again on the question of Kashmir, by Western-instigated Pakistanis. Lal Bahadur Shastri resolved not only to fight but to solve the problem once and for all, by marching on the Rawalpindi (current Islamabad). But when he had pushed near Lahore, his death was decided upon before he left for Russia; the assassination plan being set in motion while he was in India itself by CIA-controlled Indian cronies, using time-released toxins, he (unexpectedly?) died – with the blame being put on the KGB itself.

Assassination of Indira Gandhi & Rajiv Gandhi

This soft terrorism is mostly funded by the drug-trade, exactly on the lines of the East-India Company’s use of the opium trade to fund its wars. Indira Gandhi was able to disrupt this financial link between the Drug-Trade and the Soft-Terrorism, the drug trade at that time being centered in the Golden Triangle, the route passing through Punjab and Kashmir. This same drug trade was used to fund the Khalistan movement. For this she had to pay with her life – the blame being put on the Punjabis.

The same policies were continued with re-doubled effort by Mrs. Indira Gandhi, and this time once again, the American-instigated Pakistanis pushed the war on India, opening up in addition to Kashmir, fronts in Rajasthan and Bangladesh (Indo-Pakistani War of 1971). But un-expectedly for the Americans, Indira Gandhi was able to win the war. Here we refer the reader back to the article on Turkish Coup on this issue (published in GreatGameIndia‘s exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance), to note that this was exactly the time at which British-America decided to switch their policy on the Middle-East using instead of Turkey, the British-propped up Wahabbi brand of Islam in Saudi Arabia to control the Central-Eurasian politics.

Indians should note clearly that this is the time when soft-terrorism in both right (and left) wing forms started systematically moving into India. From that point until today, America has consistently looked the other way at all acts of terrorism committed by Pakistan, even until the recent Pulwama attack.

This soft terrorism is mostly funded by the drug-trade, exactly on the lines of the East-India Company’s use of the opium trade to fund its wars. Indira Gandhi was able to disrupt this financial link between the Drug-Trade and the Soft-Terrorism, the drug trade at that time being centered in the Golden Triangle, the route passing through Punjab and Kashmir. This same drug trade was used to fund the Khalistan movement. For this she had to pay with her life – the blame being put on the Punjabis.

By the time Rajiv Gandhi understood the truth of the matter, and could prevent the Western takeover of Trincomalee Naval Base, he too was killed – the blame being put on Sri Lankan Tamils.

Senseless Liberalization & Foreign Privatization

---

But Alas! What P.V. Narasimha Rao had intended as controlled Liberalization and Indian-Privatization in minimum required dose, was turned into un-controlled, destructive, directionless and senseless Liberalization and Foreign-Privatization in toxic and destructive dose under the subsequent Prime Ministers, post-Narasimha Rao. This unfortunate situation continues until now in the manner of the well known story of the Arab and the Camel.

The next Prime Minister, Narasimha Rao, was a more pragmatic, strategic and tactical veteran. He continued the same philosophy of economic self-sufficiency, international assertiveness and neutrality, however introducing regulated Privatization and Liberalization in a measure intended as a stop-gap appeasement of the West, till India could overcome its now obvious vulnerability.

But Alas! What P.V. Narasimha Rao had intended as controlled Liberalization and Indian-Privatization in minimum required dose, was turned into un-controlled, destructive, directionless and senseless Liberalization and Foreign-Privatization in toxic and destructive dose under the subsequent Prime Ministers, post-Narasimha Rao. This unfortunate situation continues until now in the manner of the well known story of the Arab and the Camel.

We were forced to kill all the defence research projects, de-grade our IITs, make ourselves the largest importers of arms in the World, over the last five years. One glaring example will suffice to tell in the recently concluded Rafale deal with France, the 36 fighter-planes cost Rs 29,000 crores, but the head-display-units for these planes imported from Israel cost Rs 14,000 crores! Our Patriots of all shades are hailing that these 14,000 crores are needed for fight in the sub-zero temperatures of Ladakh, but fighting with whom? Nevermind… Oh Yeah Patriots! For the Britishers will tell us.

When every internationally-renowned scientist is pleading for safe and cheap Thorium-based reactors, citing India as having pioneered this technology three decades ago, it is obfuscating that we want to import first and second-generation nuclear reactors from anybody who can supply them to us – while simultaneously destroying the abundant Thorium reserves available from the sands of the Indian coastline by setting up of oil-terminals and SEZs and fund the building of multiple dams on rivers that dried up decades-ago.

Mountbatten’s Promise

---

In less than twenty years, the ghost of Mountbatten and of a promise he had made to Churchill, began to appear on India. The promise was that if Churchill allowed him to pass the India Act unanimously, he would occupy the entire India in the next fifty years and deliver it back to the hands of the British-American combine.

Thus our foreign policy started dangerously veering towards the Anglo-American combine, embedding India’s strategic interests into those of the Western foreign policy objectives.

From Siachen To Karakoram

We have descended from the assertive stage of occupying the heights of Siachen to being the passive spectators when the Karakoram highway just below it, was leased to the Chinese. Why were our tanks not sent as a warning at that critical time to the Leh-sector, when we had subsequently no problem sending a paltry hundred tanks there, the latter move being under American pressure to divert Chinese attention away from the South-China Sea stand-off? Sending the tanks when the Karakoram lease was being executed would have been much more of a warning that was in our strategic interests.

Afghanistan Proxy-War

The year 1971 as alluded to into the Turkish Coup chapter in our book India in Cognitive Dissonance and mentioned again above is again critical, because it would mean that Pakistan was taken as the training ground for the Wahabbi extremists with the intention of battering the Russian underbelly and controlling Central-Asian politics, marked a point of no-return in the question of terrorism in both India and Afghanistan. With special context of Afghanistan, the proxy-war via Pakistan-staged terrorism would escalate heavily post 1979.

It should have been possible for India to step in at this juncture to protect the Afghanistan government, which by the way was also a member of Non Aligned Movement. For reasons unknown at the time, but now easy to understand, the Janata government in India censured the Russians for their move into Afghanistan on the NAM forum, but did nothing at all to censure the American-instigated, Pakistan-staged terror campaign that had been launched against the Afghans –  let alone to render any meaningful concrete assistance to the Afghan Governments – setting up a dangerous precedent for the later governments in India to veer towards one power-camp, ignoring the self-interests of India, and also disregarding the founding principles of the Non-Aligned Movement.

We have forsaken the responsibility of helping and training the Afghan government forces to counter the terrorism that is coming from their Eastern and our Western neighbor. We have deliberately let Pakistan wreck and destroy Afghanistan, tear apart social and cultural fabric of the Afghans, creating millions of refugees, turning what were once a highly vibrant cultural-spiritual center into a no-man’s land of multi-National turbaned anarchists and terrorists.

Kargil War

During the Kargil War, we did not cross the LOC to destroy the terrorist camps – unlike in all the previous wars with Pakistan. Perhaps as an unprecedented example in the Indian history, we have re-placed the field commanders of the strike forces at the start of the Kargil War, just because the Americans did not like us having our defense formations read fighting then the war according to the American diktats!

Nepalese Royal Family Massacre

We were unable to save the Nepalese Royal family knowing full well that the coup was engineered by the drug-mafia. Not only this, but Indian school text-books have been modified to suggestively teach children that Nepal constitution requires changes! (Well, what we may ask about ours? Which is written in a convoluted and contorted foreign language that the vast majority of Indians cannot understand? Oh no! please don’t ask this inconvenient question!).

Sri Lankan Civil War

Post Rajiv Gandhi, we never intervened to help the Ceylonese/Sri Lankan government to weed out the terrorist problem, allowing it instead to burn, until the ISI began to take full advantage of it, under the guidance of their patrons, the MI6 and the MOSSAD. We never reacted, even what little help was given to the Sri Lankans was given clandestinely by the concerned Intelligence agencies, not by the Government of India.

The problem of Sri Lanka (Ceylon) which initially started on an absolutely erroneous interpretation that China helped the Ceylonese government, and to counter this, India should help the Tamil rebels, rather than mediating a negotiated political settlement was a blunder that was perpetuated under the pressure of regional politics and politicians, this led to a point of intervention by every Western Intelligence agency into Sri Lanka, with London becoming the head-quarters of the terrorist organizations and India providing training for them! One consequence of this was the assassination of our prime-ministerial candidate Rajiv Gandhi.

Kashmir Question

We specifically point to Indians that at this juncture, the terrorist groups that were trained by India, listened not to India – which had facilitated and provided the training – but listened rather to their ultimate masters in London to carry out the assassination. If we don’t learn from history, it is going to repeat – to those of you who haven’t read the chapter on the Turkish Coup from our book India in Cognitive Dissonance – this time from under our nose in Balochistan!

A particular warning should be heeded by the Indians. During the southern debacle in Ceylon, India was not dismembered, thanks only to the Non-Aligned Prime Ministers. But now, this time when the debacle is brewing in our North-West, India will be literally dismembered, with Kashmir completely cut-off even from the erroneously-published maps of India!

As such, Government of India has no control over POK, except to show the territory as part of ours in Indian-published maps. Since 65 years, post the death of Lal-Bahadur Shastri, no attempt has been made to rectify the situation. Worst come, post-1971, we have seen and experienced the danger of even losing the Indian side of Kashmir, but we are still harping on “Diplomatic Solutions” – whatever they are – even after the recent Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama incidents!

Jihad-Internationale Inc.

Isn’t it wonderful (?) to hear our Deputy Foreign Minister wailing in the UN, that the failed state Pakistan is the primary sponsor for terrorists across the world, drawing these turbaned anarchists from a multitude of ethnicities and countries (who – he does not mention – are neither Islamic nor have any statehood, and yet call themselves Islamic State).

The rubbish our representatives mention in the UN is that this failed state Pakistan is not controlled by their civil administration, misguiding Indian listeners into thinking that it is the anti-India Pakistani military that is somehow responsible, while failing to mention that neither the military, nor the Pakistani Civil Administration has any control over their own country, except in taking and implementing orders given to them by the British-American-Saudi combine.

And those who compliantly accept the orders, serve the highest bidder, at times even short-changing both the Americans and the Saudis. The single minded American objective of containing Russia has caused the Americans to turn a blind-eye when these Pakistani puppets wreak havoc and mayhem in India and in Afghanistan for their sycophantic and schizophrenic personal and political satisfactions, while we are instructed by the same masters to limit ourselves to “serious” diplomatic offensives! More details on Kashmir and the Saudi-funded, American-trained, London-headquartered Jihad-Internationale Inc. wreaking havoc in India are in another GreatGameIndia publication – India in Cognitive Dissonance.

Oh, and by the way talking about the UN, the UN refuses to step-in and monitor the recent Syrian-ceasefire-evacuation in Aleppo, but they have been brought to monitor the artificially created Line-of-Control in Kashmir, which the Government of India does not (or does?) recognize?

India-US Strategic Partnership

---

Did not our own foreign secretary testifying before the Jain Commission, state that one of the motives for Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination was his refusal to allow India to be used as a base by British-American NATO planes in the Gulf War? Was this not in the true spirit of Non-Alignment Movement? What is our position now, with the recent agreement signed by India and the US on this matter? That we will allow the British-Americans to use Indian bases to launch attacks on independent nations according to their convenience, with India to decide on a “case-by-case-basis”? And what should or would have been our government’s judgment in the case of the Gulf war? May, we the Indians ask our current leadership what they think, on whether or not the British-Americans should have been allowed to use Indian bases for re-fueling NATO planes during the Gulf War?

Will we allow corrupting of our armed forces “on a case-by-case basis” as has happened in Turkey prior to the coup? Are we not witnessing rampant corruption of our political offices at the highest level when our PMO’s office itself has allowed seditious defectors from the RAW to “legally escape” and live (with their families!) in the luxury of the US, openly laughing at our political impotence while the truly patriotic Intelligence officers are crying day and night witnessing the destruction of their country right before their eyes? If a RAW officer sold secrets to Pakistan, would the PMO office follow the same principle of go-slow-on-his arrest and give him time to resettle with his entire family in Karachi?

From Presstitutes to Prostitutes?

The US Navy coming to India with bases provided for port-servicing? The agreement being signed exactly while a major investigation is underway in the US, with over 30 American Admirals being under investigation, for unspeakable corruption run by a Malaysian national (Fat Leonard), accepting prostitutes and other services in a manner completely un-becoming of American officers? The precedent of Philippines and Thailand allowing American bases for re-fueling and ship-servicing purposes and husbanding has resulted their becoming in a very short time, International Prostitution Capitals and paved the way for the sovereign republics to become docile, sheepish vassals of British-American hegemony.

Is India competing for this same status as No.1 International Prostitution Capital? And if we look at the successive coalition governments of all colors and shades, the answer seems to be a re-sounding, emphatic Yes – business indeed! Anyway by liberally allowing privatization of media, we have already become the Presstitute capital for Western interests.

Brexit

With a missionary zeal, every media outlet has announced, that post-BREXIT, India will pour investment into Britain to save it, while we ourselves are borrowing from World Bank, IMF, not to mention from Dubai and Saudi-Arabia for our own Development Projects! Of course some patriots will be content with saying that after all “it is anyway our own black money that is going out to Dubai and merely returning to India… so we should be proud about this remarkable achievement!” (Let us give credit where it is due: at least they know it is our own money).

And, when several Western Media outlets hailed the Freedom of Expression against Globalization and oppression of 12-million striking Bank employees of India recently, there is an absolutely deafening silence in the entire Indian Media – as if this incident took place in another planet!

Dummies Guide To Democracy

---

It is alarming that India is becoming a boy-scout for British-American regime change / creation of democracy / mediated and propped up by mediocre psychopathic corporate media aligned with the interests of the British-American military industrial complex for whom war is a terrific business, terrorism is a glorified input, pushing drug addiction is a required raw-material and the resulting destruction of civil-cultural life is an un-avoidable collateral damage in the march for the advance of free-market forces, the last being claimed as the foundation of democracy.

The dummy’s guide for freedom-fighters/terrorist/birth-of-new-nations/division-re-division of geostrategic geographies is as follows.

1. Accuse the target government of killing and raping its own civilians.
2. Setup International Donors via NGO’s for the victims.
3. Relentlessly repeat on and off atrocities committed by the government on their own populations (real or imaginary).
4. Western democracies will start a funding for victims, including self-defence forces, with training for the latter being sub-contracted to puppet regimes who feel themselves as regional-powers/front-line states in combating terrorism.
5. The Western countries will flout every international treaty signed to prevent the giving of lethal arms to conflict-zones and supply them to these self-defence forces.
6. When enough men are trained, they will be prompted to attack the government positions and soft targets, which will be met with severe reprisals by sovereign governments.
7. These reprisals will be shown as a further example of atrocities on the civilians, and then used to set-up governments in exile.
8. When the self-defence forces fail to fight regimes, the West will impose a no-fly-zone, paving the way for direct military intervention.
9. Finally, when self-defence forces cannot fight the sovereign regimes, there will be direct Western military intervention in the name of “Responsibility to Reconstruct”.

From East-Timor to Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia, Libya, Iraq and finally in the case of Syria. The above dummy-rule-book have been thoroughly, successfully and precisely implemented.

Balochistan – The No Man’s Land

---

The failure of the West in the case of Syria has put most of their Self-defence-forces (called by various names: Al-Qaida, ISIS, ISIL, Moderates, Al-Nusra etc.) in mortal existential danger. They have to be re-located and preserved in a semi-no-man’s land for future use against either Iran or Russia. That no-man’s land is Balochistan. And the future puppet regime to train these self-defence forces in the sycophantic delusion of being a regional power – is India.

This we will be doing “as a checkmate to the atrocities committed in Kashmir by the Pakistanis. Prophetically, to prove the atrocities, exactly at the time when India’s granting of asylum to the Balochi rebels is being discussed, the Uri-attack occurs. Isn’t the connection obvious? The same with Pulwama attack that precisely occurred a day after Baloch Martyrs Day when the Free Balochistan Movement was kickstarted from London interestingly releasing a short paper outlining their vision for a post-Khamenei Iran on the very next day when elite Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps were also attacked Pulwama-style, who now happens to be prime US target with incidentally the same RGC who were attacked now being designated as a “terrorist outfit”. And now as a cherry-on-top we are also commanded to stop buying oil from Iran because: Hey, RGC is a terror outfit and the United States does not negotiate with terrorists! Where have the international relations and terrorism experts gone when we really need them?

Balochistan In Perspective

But for our highly intelligent Indians, let us re-state some facts on Balochistan which the current Indian pro-British Presstitutes will not mention:

From the inception of Pakistan, Balochistan was the most neglected region. With the creation of the Afghan problem on the Durand line and the subsequent conflicts, most of the Pashtu tribes relocated to the Balochi areas, altering the population-demographics from 100% Balochi to 70-30% Balochi-Pasthu demographics. Once the tremendous amount of natural resources were discovered, Pakistan has resorted to ruthless exploitation of these resources for the benefits of Western multinationals. With Pakistan becoming a frontline state in fighting terrorism, post 1971, a massive ethnic cleansing program of the Balochis was started by Pakistan, under the instruction of their Western masters, citing the reason that the Balochis are culturally close to the Indians.

The limited concept of self-determination, democracy, utilization of regional resources for the people of Balochistan was completely ignored. The Pujanbi dominated army and civil administrations of Islamabad resorted to atrocious oppression and suppression of Balochi rights by jailing, maiming, killing, bombing of civilian centers, including Quetta since the last 30 years – right under the knowledge of the British-American sponsors of Pakistan.

Most of the Balochis fled into Iran, and just as the Pashtu problem is created by the Durand line, splitting the Pashtus into Afghan and Pakistan, imposing two nation-hoods on them, which they never recognized until today, so too the Balochi inhabited lands were divided between Pakistan and Iran, imposing two Nation-hoods on them which they never recognized either. Iran has supported most of these rebels for long time, giving them asylum, and there are members of the Iranian Parliament representing the Balochi people. Recently, Pakistan has given away large areas of these Balochi lands on lease to Multi-National and Chinese companies, including the port Gwadar, so that China could move Iranian oil and other precious natural Balochi resources via Karakoram into the mainland China – the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Just as any fundamentalist Islamic nation, derecognizes the problem of minorities, so too the Pakistanis never acknowledged Balochistan as being a question to address, always claiming that there are no Balochis living in this entire area, except Quetta, while simultaneously carrying on an ethnic-cleansing and genocide. All these years, the West looked the other way as Pakistan was their frontline state in “fighting terrorism” – read fighting the Russian underbelly via the Jihad Internationale Inc.

Save Balochistan – From Whom?

So now our very intelligent Indians may please answer these questions: When this massacre of Balochis was going on unabated for the past 30 years, why only now have the rights of Balochis suddenly become a high priority for the west in general and for the Indian-Corporate-Presstitutes in particular? Especially in guiding the Foreign Policy of India?

When every single weapon-system that was given to Pakistan to fight the Russians was used against the Balochis and Kashmiris (in the fashion of the Saudis annihilating Yemeni civilians today), now is it India’s responsibility to train the Balochi Self-defense forces to fight the British-American trained Pakistani Army and Saudi-funded Wahabi Jihadists? Why don’t the British-Americans who control the civilian military apparatus of Pakistan, who can create a no-fly-zones at their whim and fancy, simply tell Pakistan to Back-off from Balochistan?

But in an Orwellian twist, and in an O’Henry style of screen-play Indian media is propagating that “We the Indians” have to “Save Balochistan” by arming, funding and training the Balochis and pitting them against the Pakistani establishment… What a convoluted suggestion! When we could not even take down a single terrorist camp in POK even until today… Why, because our British-American masters don’t like it?

The ridiculous part is that we whine at every available International Forum that our Partitioned-Cousins (aka-the-Pakistanis) are training, arming Khalistani and Kashmiri Militants along with a slew of Indian-home-grown terrorists of all shades, left as well as right.

Why India Now?

---

While Jawaharlal Nehru had in United Nations on the Suez-Crisis issue declared Britain to be a terrorist state, and was assassinated for doing this, are we today chasing the British tail and ourselves becoming sponsors of terrorism? The correct solution to Kashmir is not by setting the stupid example “Terrorism will be fought by Terrorism”, but by routing Terrorism by all available means at the disposal of a strong Independent State, starting with diplomacy which has now been going on for over forty years but is today on life-support of the Western pressure. Let Indians take the healthy stand that Terrorism should be fought by strong State Forces as did Russia, Turkey and Syria in the recent months.

It is amusing to watch the epileptic and short memory of the Indian Foreign Minister of State on his four nation tour, from Iran to Lebanon when he got a drubbing on the real founders, funders and trainers of terrorism of all alpha-numeric Jihadi-Internationale Inc., and a request for India to play an important role in combating this terrorism. But upon landing in India, he forgot all his lessons and remembered only one country – Pakistan – as the Central University of Terrorism – a country which was perhaps not even mentioned in the entire discussions of his four-nation tour? Perhaps, the aircraft he traveled on had some memory-erasing fields and his mind rebooted to the British-American-Foreign-Policy factory settings, maybe?

So again, the question Why Balochistan? And why India now? For once if we keep the insanity-causing Psychopathic Presstitute Publicity aside and use instead, the 1000-gram substance in our own heads at only 0.0001% of its capacity for a few minutes the following scenario emerges for even the blind-and-deaf-and-dumb:

It is just that simple! And we may add, with a shared-beer and cheers from Pakistan’s Diplomats! Thus, we have been told by the West to go the diplomatic route post-Uri.

It is just that simple!